28 Which was the son of Melchi, G3197 which was the son of Addi, G78 which was the son of Cosam, G2973 which was the son of Elmodam, G1678 which was the son of Er, G2262
29 Which was the son of Jose, G2499 which was the son of Eliezer, G1663 which was the son of Jorim, G2497 which was the son of Matthat, G3158 which was the son of Levi, G3017
30 Which was the son of Simeon, G4826 which was the son of Juda, G2455 which was the son of Joseph, G2501 which was the son of Jonan, G2494 which was the son of Eliakim, G1662
31 Which was the son of Melea, G3190 which was the son of Menan, G3104 which was the son of Mattatha, G3160 which was the son of Nathan, G3481 which was the son of David, G1138
32 Which was the son of Jesse, G2421 which was the son of Obed, G5601 which was the son of Booz, G1003 which was the son of Salmon, G4533 which was the son of Naasson, G3476
33 Which was the son of Aminadab, G284 which was the son of Aram, G689 which was the son of Esrom, G2074 which was the son of Phares, G5329 which was the son of Juda, G2455
34 Which was the son of Jacob, G2384 which was the son of Isaac, G2464 which was the son of Abraham, G11 which was the son of Thara, G2291 which was the son of Nachor, G3493
35 Which was the son of Saruch, G4562 which was the son of Ragau, G4466 which was the son of Phalec, G5317 which was the son of Heber, G1443 which was the son of Sala, G4527
36 Which was the son of Cainan, G2536 which was the son of Arphaxad, G742 which was the son of Sem, G4590 which was the son of Noe, G3575 which was the son of Lamech, G2984
37 Which was the son of Mathusala, G3103 which was the son of Enoch, G1802 which was the son of Jared, G2391 which was the son of Maleleel, G3121 which was the son of Cainan, G2536
38 Which was the son of Enos, G1800 which was the son of Seth, G4589 which was the son of Adam, G76 which was the son of God. G2316
Worthy.Bible » Commentaries » Matthew Henry Commentary » Commentary on Luke 3
Commentary on Luke 3 Matthew Henry Commentary
Chapter 3
Nothing is related concerning our Lord Jesus from his twelfth year to his entrance on his thirtieth year. We often think it would have been a pleasure and advantage to us if we had journals, or at least annuls, of occurrences concerning him; but we have as much as Infinite Wisdom thought fit to communicate to us, and, if we improve not that, neither should we have improved more if we had had it. The great intention of the evangelists was to give us an account of the gospel of Christ, which we are to believe, and by which we hope for salvation: now that began in the ministry and baptism of John, and therefore they hasten to give us an account of that. We could wish, perhaps, that Luke had wholly passed by what was related by Matthew and Mark, and had written only what was new, as he has done in his two first chapters. But it was the will of the Spirit that some things should be established out of the mouth, not only of two, but of three witnesses; and we must not reckon it a needless repetition, nor shall we do so if we renew out meditations upon these things, with suitable affections. In this chapter we have,
Luk 3:1-14
John's baptism introducing a new dispensation, it was requisite that we should have a particular account of it. Glorious things were said of John, what a distinguished favourite of Heaven he should be, and what a great blessing to this earth (ch. 1:15, 17); but we lost him in the deserts, and there he remains until the day of his showing unto Israel, ch. 1:80. And now at last that day dawns, and a welcome day it was to them that waited for it more than they that waited for the morning. Observe here,
Luk 3:15-20
We are now drawing near to the appearance of our Lord Jesus publicly; the Sun will not be long after the morning-star. We are here told,
The evangelist concludes his account of John's preaching with an et caetera (v. 18): Many other things in his exhortation preached he unto the people, which are not recorded.
Luk 3:21-38
The evangelist mentioned John's imprisonment before Christ's being baptized, though it was nearly a year after it, because he would finish the story of John's ministry, and then introduce that of Christ. Now here we have,
One difficulty occurs between Abraham and Noah, which gives us some perplexity, v. 35, 36. Sala is said to be the son of Cainan, and he the son of Arphaxad, whereas Sala was the son of Arphaxad (Gen. 10:24; 11:12), and there is no such man as Cainan found there. But, as to that, it is sufficient to say that the Seventy Interpreters, who, before our Saviour's time, translated the Old Testament into Greek, for reasons best known to themselves inserted that Cainan; and St. Luke, writing among the Hellenist Jews, was obliged to make use of that translation, and therefore to take it as he found it.
The genealogy concludes with this, who was the son of Adam, the son of God.